The Lost Foundations of Psychedelic Science:
Special Issue of Psychedelic Medicine
Guest Editors:
Nathan H. Heller, Johns Hopkins Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, USA
Frederick S. Barrett, Johns Hopkins Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, USA
Many promising lines of psychedelic research were prematurely abandoned in the 1970s, their threads interrupted before their findings could shape the field’s trajectory. A number of these threads are also published in languages other than English, limiting their import to modern psychedelic science even if they were rediscovered. This special issue of Psychedelic Medicine aims to recover and revive those dormant threads. We are seeking scholarly contributions that bring visibility to neglected studies, re-examine forgotten research programs, and articulate how these lost foundations can inform and challenge today’s psychedelic science. Contributors are encouraged to mine historical literature, revisit overlooked paradigms, and connect past insights with current empirical, theoretical, or clinical frameworks. We especially encourage translation of forgotten but important papers from this past era.
Preferred Types of Contributions:
Historical Translations with Commentary
English translations of non-English psychedelic research articles that merit wider recognition. Submissions must include commentary situating the work in its historical and current scientific context. Visit the Translations tab for detailed instructions.Narrative Reviews of Dormant Research Programs
In-depth explorations of psychedelic research programs that were showing promise before being disrupted. Submissions should map out the trajectory of the original work and connect it to present-day questions, tools, and approaches.
We also welcome other creative scholarly formats that meaningfully engage with the theme of the special issue.
Click Link Here to Send a Pre-submission Abstract
Prospective contributors must first submit a pre-submission abstract (200–300 words) outlining their proposed topic, along with links to key historical source material they intend to analyze, translate, or build upon. Pre-submission abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for thematic fit. Those that are approved will be posted on this site to help guide prospective authors and prevent unnecessary redundancy. See examples that have been approved below.
Note: If you intend to write a manuscript that argues a unique position on a topic already approved for review, we encourage you to send us a pre-submission abstract.
Abstracts Approved for Review
Hallucinations Re-captured: Resurrecting and Recontextualizing the First Psychedelic Neuropsychopharmacology Investigation
Authors: Nathan H. Heller, Jason Samaha, Renaud Jardri, and Frederick S. Barrett
Type: Historical Translation with Commentary
Language: French to English
Source Title: Étude de l’électrencéphalogramme humain dans un cas d’intoxication mescalinique (Chweitzer, Geblewicz, & Liberson, 1936)
English Title: Study of Human Electroencephalogram in a Case of Mescalin Intoxication
Abstract: This contribution presents the first English translation of a groundbreaking yet nearly forgotten study, Étude de l’électrencéphalogramme humain dans un cas d’intoxication mescalinique (1936), authored by A. Chweitzer, E. Geblewicz, and W. Liberson. The study likely represents the earliest attempt to measure brain activity following psychedelic administration. Using EEG, the authors monitored a single subject participant during the acute effects ofunder mescaline, capturing fluctuations in alpha (Berger) rhythms and linking them in real time to hallucinatory episodes. Their approach, observing ‘a-wave silences’ alongside vivid perceptual distortions, anticipates what is now known as the ‘hallucination capture’ paradigm, the real-time tracking of hallucinatory phenomena with neural signals. In our accompanying commentary, we pursue two aims. First, we situate this study within the early history of psychedelic science, when researchers were beginning to link hallucinogenic experience with neural oscillations. Second, to we connect that early framework to both modern hallucination capture approaches and contemporary efforts to understand the role of spectral dynamics in visual perception. By revisiting Chweitzer et al., we aim to restore this study to its rightful place in the lineage of psychedelic neuroscience, and to rekindle interest in using psychedelics as a tool for investigating hallucinogenesis.
Psychedelics and Reward Processing: A Historical Review Before and After the 1970 Controlled Substances Act
Authors: Matthew Company
Type: Narrative Review
Abstract: Beginning in the mid-20th century, behavioral neuroscientists studied psychedelics’ effects on the brain’s reward system. Early LSD-focused work reported paradoxical interactions with dopamine signaling across brain regions. At the same time, other studies probed misuse potential through catecholamine assays and behavioral reward paradigms, raising tantalizing questions about serotonin–dopamine cross-talk. Despite this momentum, research collapsed after the U.S. Controlled Substances Act (1970), the 1975 withdrawal of the National Institute of Mental Health hallucinogen funding, and the creation of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, which redirected pharmacology research toward psychostimulant-abuse studies. Nearly all psychedelics, ketamine, a dissociative exception aside, were placed in Schedule I, the category reserved for drugs with “no accepted medical use,” leaving key questions unanswered. Although constraints were severe, a handful of papers published during the “psychedelic dark ages” (late 1970s – early 2000s) showed that classic psychedelics are non-habit forming and may reduce alcohol, opioid, and stimulant self-administration in preclinical models, hinting at utility for substance-use disorders. These findings quietly laid the groundwork for demonstrated safety and low abuse liability, paving the way for the modern psychedelic renaissance. Today, multidisciplinary teams armed with modern pharmacology, optogenetics, chemogenetics, and multimodal neural recording techniques are dissecting circuit-level mechanisms by which psychedelics recalibrate reward-prediction errors and drive enduring behavioral change. Re-examining the dormant literature through the lens of these technologies, this review maps actionable experiments that can finally test and extend the questions first posed more than half a century ago.
Historical perspectives on combining brain stimulation with psychedelics
Authors: Lucas Dwiel
Type: Narrative Review
Abstract: Multiple frameworks in psychiatry—from biomedical and biopsychosocial to phenomenological and existential—share a fundamental belief that the treatment of psychiatric illness relies upon influencing neural processes. Neuroplastic mechanisms create long-lasting changes in brain structure and function, thereby producing enduring changes in psychiatric symptoms. Psychedelic drugs engage these neuroplastic mechanisms to reshape neural circuits through alteration of synapses, dendrites, and axons. However, the effects of psychedelics are broadly distributed across the brain rather than specifically targeting the circuit(s) underlying a given symptom or illness. Combining psychedelics with targeted brain stimulation may engage and guide psychedelic-induced neuroplasticity in precise neural circuits, promoting durable alterations in circuit organization and the associated psychological processes. Historically, the serotonergic psychedelic LSD has been paired with brain stimulation, specifically electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), for a variety of purposes. In trying to treat patients with schizophrenia, some used LSD to provoke psychosis before applying ECT, others used ECT to treat LSD-induced psychosis in otherwise healthy individuals. At the same time, LSD and mescaline were used as tools to elucidate the neurophysiological effects of ECT. Last, there is evidence that LSD and ECT were combined as a part of MKULTRA to break down and then reconstruct thoughts and behavior patterns through “depatterning” and “psychic driving”. Each of these lines of inquiry saw some reported success, but most were eventually discontinued—due to a lack of replication, a broader shift away from administering psychedelics to patients with psychotic tendencies, and a growing recognition of patients’ rights. As we begin to study the combination of psychedelics and brain stimulation today, it is important that we keep in mind both the successes and failures of the past. Engaging critically with that history allows us to better understand our own motivations and interrogate the frameworks and assumptions we bring to this research.
Lost in Translation: Regrounding Early LSD Studies on Artistic Perception in the Framework of Embodied Cognition
Authors: Antoine Bellemare-Pepin, Philipp Thölke, and Karim Jerbi
Type: Historical Translation with Commentary
Language: German to English
Source Title: Malerei aus Bereichen des Unbewussten: Künstler experimentieren unter LSD (Richard P. Hartmann, 1974)
English Title: Painting from realms of the unconscious: Artists experiment under LSD
Abstract: Historical research into psychedelics and creativity often remains underappreciated, especially with regard to altered perception and its influence on artistic processes. Here, we present an English translation and commentary on the core theoretical section (pages 11–55) of ""Malerei aus Bereichen des Unbewußten: Künstler experimentieren unter LSD"" (Painting from Realms of the Unconscious: Artists Experimenting Under LSD), a seminal yet neglected German text documenting early systematic experiments with visual artists under LSD. This book uniquely combines detailed phenomenological reports with theoretical reflections, highlighting how altered perception—ranging from synesthesia and illusions to complex inner imagery—shapes artistic creativity. More specifically, the authors catalogue a graduated series of visual alterations that together form an early taxonomy of psychedelic perception. They show how such shifts heighten pareidolia in ambiguous or multistable images and culminate in new creative affordances through Gestaltungszerfall—a disruption in the formation of stable perception leading to symbol-laden fragments. Our commentary situates these historical findings within the framework of embodied cognition and participatory sense-making, highlighting how creative expression is shaped and enhanced by expanded perceptual affordances. We further contextualize this historical perspective within contemporary research on psychedelic creativity, which has predominantly focused on therapeutic or emotional outcomes, and has largely overlooked the participatory and embodied nature of perceptual transformation. Additionally, we explore how the frameworks and methodologies introduced in this work can be revitalized with modern scientific tools, opening new empirical avenues for investigating perceptual processes such as pareidolia and their implications for creative sense-making. This translation aims not only to enrich current dialogues between neuroscience, creativity, and psychedelic studies, but also to catalyze novel interdisciplinary research directions that bridge historical insights with contemporary embodied and participatory approaches to creative cognition.
Instructions for Translation Projects
1. Source Selection
Choose a non-English source that:
- Ensures the source has not already been widely translated into English.
- Offers empirical and/or conceptual value for contemporary psychedelic science.
2. Rights and Permissions
Before translating:
- Confirm that the original work is in the public domain or obtain written permission from the rights holder.
- If only a portion of the text will be translated under fair use, please explain your rationale.
- Note: Proof of permission or documentation of public domain/fair use status is expected at the time of manuscript submission.
3. Translation Proposal
Along with your pre-submission abstract (200–300 words), please include:
- A brief description of the original source (author, title, publication info).
- Its relevance to the special issue.
- A plan for your translation and commentary, including how the translation will be verified.
- A link to the source material, if available.
Use of AI Translation Tools
AI tools (e.g., Google Translate, DeepL, GPT) may be used for a first-pass translation under these conditions:
- A fluent speaker of the source language must carefully review, edit, and take responsibility for the final version.
- This individual must be clearly identified in your submission and ideally have relevant academic or scientific background.
- In your translation plan, include a short description of how the translation was produced (e.g., “initial pass with DeepL, verified and edited by Dr. [Name], native French speaker and clinical psychologist”).
- Note: Unverified AI-generated translations will not be accepted.
5. Commentary Requirement
Each translation must be accompanied by an original scholarly commentary (2000–3000 words) that:
- Situates the source in its historical and current scientific context.
- Explains its relevance to contemporary psychedelic science.
- Justifies any important interpretive or terminological choices made during translation.
6. Editorial Review of Translation Quality
To ensure fidelity, the editorial team will conduct an independent translation review by:
- Sharing the original text and English translation with a neutral fluent third-party reader, requesting a brief report on clarity and accuracy.
- If concerns arise, contributors may be asked to revise the translation.